Take advantage of the command design pattern to decouple the requester of an action from the object that executes the action Credit: fdecomite Design patterns are proven solutions used to solve common design problems and reduce the complexities in code. The Gang of Four design patterns fall into three categories: Creational — patterns related to object creation Structural — patterns related to object assembly Behavioral — patterns related to object collaboration and separation of responsibilities The command design pattern falls under the behavioral pattern category. This article explores how we can work with the command design pattern in C#. What is the command design pattern? The intent of the command design pattern is to decouple the requester of an action from the object that executes the action. In the command design pattern, a request is encapsulated as an object that contains all information about the request. This object is then passed to an invoker object. The invoker object then looks for the appropriate object to handle the command and passes the command to the object. The command design pattern is a good choice when you want to implement callbacks, queuing tasks, tracking history, and undo/redo functionality in your application. The command pattern is a good choice for implementing retry mechanisms – when your application would like to reattempt connecting to a service at a later point in time which is not up and running at this moment. The Command pattern is also used in message queuing applications, i.e., in applications that need to recover from data loss. Command design pattern participants In a classic implementation of the Command pattern you have four components: the command, the invoker, the receiver, and the client. The participants in the command design pattern include the following: Command — provides an interface for executing an operation ConcreteCommand — extends the Command interface and implements the Execute method Client — instantiates a ConcreteCommand class Invoker — informs the command to execute the request Receiver — contains the logic for executing the operations associated with the request Command design pattern example in C# In the next section we’ll explore how we can implement the command design pattern. In our example, we will implement a simple calculator using the following classes: Command (Command abstract base class) SimpleCalculator (Receiver class) AddCommand (concrete command class) SubstractCommand (concrete command class) Multiply Command (concrete command class) DivideCommand (concrete command class) Invoker (Invoker class) Create the Command abstract base class in C# Consider the following abstract base class named Command that contains the declaration of the Execute method. public abstract class Command { protected SimpleCalculator receiver; public Command(SimpleCalculator receiver) { this.receiver = receiver; } public abstract int Execute(); } The following enum shows the operations that will be supported in our simple calculator. public enum CommandOption { Add, Substract, Multiply, Divide } Create the Receiver class in C# The following is a class named SimpleCalculator. This class acts as the Receiver and contains the definition of the Add, Subtract, Multiply, and Divide methods. public class SimpleCalculator { private int _x, _y; public SimpleCalculator(int a, int b) { _x = a; _y = b; } public int Add() { return _x + _y; } public int Subtract() { return _x - _y; } public int Multiply() { return _x * _y; } public int Divide() { return _x / _y; } } Create the concrete command classes in C# The concrete command classes extend the Command abstract base class and implement the Execute method as shown below. public class AddCommand : Command { private SimpleCalculator _calculator; public AddCommand(SimpleCalculator calculator) : base(calculator) { _calculator = calculator; } public override int Execute() { return _calculator.Add(); } } public class SubtractCommand : Command { private SimpleCalculator _calculator; public SubtractCommand(SimpleCalculator calculator) : base(calculator) { _calculator = calculator; } public override int Execute() { return _calculator.Subtract(); } } public class MultiplyCommand : Command { private SimpleCalculator _calculator; public MultiplyCommand(SimpleCalculator calculator) : base(calculator) { _calculator = calculator; } public override int Execute() { return _calculator.Multiply(); } } public class DivideCommand : Command { private SimpleCalculator _calculator; public DivideCommand(SimpleCalculator calculator) : base(calculator) { _calculator = calculator; } public override int Execute() { return _calculator.Divide(); } } Create the Invoker class in C# The following code snippet illustrates the Invoker class. It contains two methods, SetCommand and Execute. While SetCommand is used to assign the command object to the private Command reference in the Invoker class, Execute is used to execute the command. public class Invoker { private Command _command; public void SetCommand(Command command) { _command = command; } public int Execute() { return _command.Execute(); } } The command design pattern in action in C# Finally, the following code snippet illustrates how you can perform a simple calculation using the SimpleCalculator class. static void Main(string[] args) { SimpleCalculator calculator = new SimpleCalculator(15, 3); var addCommand = new AddCommand(calculator); var substractCommand = new SubtractCommand(calculator); var multiplyCommand = new MultiplyCommand(calculator); var divideCommand = new DivideCommand(calculator); Invoker invoker = new Invoker(); invoker.SetCommand(addCommand); Console.WriteLine("Result is {0}", invoker.Execute()); invoker.SetCommand(substractCommand); Console.WriteLine("Result is {0}", invoker.Execute()); invoker.SetCommand(multiplyCommand); Console.WriteLine("Result is {0}", invoker.Execute()); invoker.SetCommand(divideCommand); Console.WriteLine("Result is {0}", invoker.Execute()); Console.ReadLine(); } The command design pattern provides support for extensibility and reduces the coupling that exists between the invoker and receiver of a command. Since the request is encapsulated into a stand-alone object, you can parameterize methods with different requests, save requests in a queue, and even provide support for redo-able or undo-able operations. — Do more with C#: How to work with AutoMapper in C# When to use an abstract class vs. interface in C# How to work with threads in C# How to use the Dapper ORM in C# How to implement the repository design pattern in C# How to implement a simple logger in C# How to work with delegates in C# How to work with Action, Func, and Predicate delegates in C# How to work with log4net in C# How to work with reflection in C# Related content feature What is Rust? Safe, fast, and easy software development Unlike most programming languages, Rust doesn't make you choose between speed, safety, and ease of use. Find out how Rust delivers better code with fewer compromises, and a few downsides to consider before learning Rust. By Serdar Yegulalp Nov 20, 2024 11 mins Rust Programming Languages Software Development how-to Kotlin for Java developers: Classes and coroutines Kotlin was designed to bring more flexibility and flow to programming in the JVM. Here's an in-depth look at how Kotlin makes working with classes and objects easier and introduces coroutines to modernize concurrency. By Matthew Tyson Nov 20, 2024 9 mins Java Kotlin Programming Languages news F# 9 adds nullable reference types Latest version of Microsoft’s functional .NEt programming language provides a type-safe way to handle reference types that can have null as a valid value. By Paul Krill Nov 18, 2024 3 mins Microsoft .NET Programming Languages Software Development news Go language evolving for future hardware, AI workloads The Go team is working to adapt Go to large multicore systems, the latest hardware instructions, and the needs of developers of large-scale AI systems. By Paul Krill Nov 15, 2024 3 mins Google Go Generative AI Programming Languages Resources Videos